<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battleworn Tuskguard&#8230; not so worn anymore.</title>
	<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/</link>
	<description>A guide to tanking as a warrior in world of warcraft</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Khrushchev</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2994</link>
		<author>Khrushchev</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>(This was assuming 12 stam gems and the 18 stam meta.  If you put 3 15 stam gems in the tuskguard then it has 5 more stam than the goggles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(This was assuming 12 stam gems and the 18 stam meta.  If you put 3 15 stam gems in the tuskguard then it has 5 more stam than the goggles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khrushchev</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2993</link>
		<author>Khrushchev</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>If gemmed for Stam, the goggles have 1 more stam.  Tuskguard has more armor and just the tiniest bit more defense and dodge.  Not so much that you'd notice.  Goggles have hit rating while Tuskguard has block value.  The armor is a pretty minor upgrade, too.  All in all, I'd say the tuskguard is a very minor upgrade, but if you can't stand to lose the hit rating, you might stay with the goggles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If gemmed for Stam, the goggles have 1 more stam.  Tuskguard has more armor and just the tiniest bit more defense and dodge.  Not so much that you&#8217;d notice.  Goggles have hit rating while Tuskguard has block value.  The armor is a pretty minor upgrade, too.  All in all, I&#8217;d say the tuskguard is a very minor upgrade, but if you can&#8217;t stand to lose the hit rating, you might stay with the goggles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2983</link>
		<author>Frank</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2983</guid>
		<description>How do this helm compare to the engineering helm Tankatronic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do this helm compare to the engineering helm Tankatronic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veneretio</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2385</link>
		<author>Veneretio</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 23:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2385</guid>
		<description>Excellent point. I have to say that when I initially wrote this, I really felt a lot better about the new meta than I do now. It turns out that it really doesn't offer too much BV after all even in a threat set. The T6 Helm naturally out paces the Tuskguard as a threat helm, but I have to agree that T5 really doesn't seem to keep up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point. I have to say that when I initially wrote this, I really felt a lot better about the new meta than I do now. It turns out that it really doesn&#8217;t offer too much BV after all even in a threat set. The T6 Helm naturally out paces the Tuskguard as a threat helm, but I have to agree that T5 really doesn&#8217;t seem to keep up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geros</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2381</link>
		<author>Geros</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>I think that is a misleading statement to indicate battleworn can't win as both the survival helm and the threat helm.  With Shield Mastery, it's adding 66 block value.  You have to have a lot of shield block value outside of the helmet slot to make T5/Tankatronic goggles beat battleworn.  It's much easier for T4 to do so, since it has 39(50) shield block value on the item prior to the Eternal Earthstorm Diamond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is a misleading statement to indicate battleworn can&#8217;t win as both the survival helm and the threat helm.  With Shield Mastery, it&#8217;s adding 66 block value.  You have to have a lot of shield block value outside of the helmet slot to make T5/Tankatronic goggles beat battleworn.  It&#8217;s much easier for T4 to do so, since it has 39(50) shield block value on the item prior to the Eternal Earthstorm Diamond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fentar</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1695</link>
		<author>fentar</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>Can you throw in a comparison to the t1 and t2 engineering helms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you throw in a comparison to the t1 and t2 engineering helms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elruk</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1627</link>
		<author>Elruk</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>Was just wondering if anyone had done the maths comparing these to the Tankatronic Goggles you can make with engineering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was just wondering if anyone had done the maths comparing these to the Tankatronic Goggles you can make with engineering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arideni</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1495</link>
		<author>Arideni</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>...and to think I was just discussing tight defense rating recently.

The potential options created by these changes are much needed &#38; should lead to some even more interesting developments. This should really open up some new doors &#38; oh, how I love doors.

Thanks for the heads-up on this change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and to think I was just discussing tight defense rating recently.</p>
<p>The potential options created by these changes are much needed &amp; should lead to some even more interesting developments. This should really open up some new doors &amp; oh, how I love doors.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads-up on this change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kennetco</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1477</link>
		<author>Kennetco</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>I am hoping that you will be updating the uncrittable &#38; uncrushable listing given the new items available with 2.4... as well as comment on an 'expertise cap' now that so many items come with expertise... pretty please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hoping that you will be updating the uncrittable &amp; uncrushable listing given the new items available with 2.4&#8230; as well as comment on an &#8216;expertise cap&#8217; now that so many items come with expertise&#8230; pretty please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1452</link>
		<author>Erik</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tankingtips.com/2008/03/27/battleworn-tuskguard-not-so-worn-anymore/#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>I must say now that we're reaching the end-game where shadow and fire res is required for the tanks, this helm has come more or less as a god-send. High stamina, high defence and aggro - throw on a +FR or +SR enchant and you got one of the best resistance pieces in-game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say now that we&#8217;re reaching the end-game where shadow and fire res is required for the tanks, this helm has come more or less as a god-send. High stamina, high defence and aggro - throw on a +FR or +SR enchant and you got one of the best resistance pieces in-game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
